- Nuclear Update
- Posts
- ⚛️From Feeding the World to Powering It
⚛️From Feeding the World to Powering It
If you work in or around nuclear, your mental material list probably goes uranium, zirconium, hafnium, maybe a little bit of boron if you’re feeling fancy. Phosphate sounds like it belongs in a farmer’s catalog, not in a conversation about reactors, AI data centers, and grid stability. Yet here we are.

Welcome to Nuclear Update.
If you work in or around nuclear, your mental material list probably goes uranium, zirconium, hafnium, maybe a little bit of boron if you’re feeling fancy.
Phosphate sounds like it belongs in a farmer’s catalog, not in a conversation about reactors, AI data centers, and grid stability.
Yet here we are.
In 2025, this dull sounding mineral has crept into the same strategic conversations as uranium and enrichment. It shows up in battery labs, in energy security briefings, and increasingly, in policy documents.
This is the final part of the First Phosphate series, if you missed the first one, read it here: ⚛️ The Mineral Behind Nuclear Power’s AI Advantage
⚛️From Feeding the World to Powering It
For most of modern history, phosphate’s job description was simple: feed the world.
You dig phosphate rock out of the ground, process it into fertilizer, spread it on fields, and crops grow. If you worked in nuclear, you did not need to think about it.
That story changed the moment LFP batteries walked onto the stage.
LFP stands for lithium iron phosphate. It is a battery chemistry that gives up a bit of raw energy density in exchange for three things engineers actually care about: safety, long cycle life, and lower cost. If you are trying to build big stationary batteries to sit next to a nuclear plant or an AI data center, those trade offs are attractive.
By mass, phosphate is the backbone in an LFP cathode. Take the P out of LFP and the entire crystal structure collapses.
So somewhere between “fertilizer ingredient” and “backs up reactors and GPUs”, phosphate changed jobs.
đź§± Igneous rock, not your average dirt
“Phosphate” is not one uniform thing. Geologists split deposits into two big families that behave very differently when you try to do anything high purity with them.
Most of the world’s phosphate comes from sedimentary deposits. These are the workhorse rocks for fertilizer. Big tonnages, big mines, chemistry that is good enough when the final product is going on fields. They also tend to drag along a cocktail of impurities that are annoying and expensive to strip out if your goal is ultra clean battery material.

Igneous phosphate is the rarer cousin. It forms in completely different geological settings, it usually comes with higher inherent purity, and it responds much better when you ask it to become battery grade purified phosphoric acid instead of crop food.
You can think of it like starting a reactor with very clean, very consistent fuel versus trying to run something with whatever random mix happens to be lying around. Both might technically work, but one of them is going to make the engineers much happier.
Only a small slice of global phosphate sits in these igneous systems. When you find one in a friendly jurisdiction, close to power and ports, you are looking at potential leverage in the entire energy system.
North America has very few of these deposits, which is why the igneous system being advanced by First Phosphate in Québec has drawn so much attention lately.
đź§ When rocks end up in strategy documents
Governments have noticed that you cannot talk about nuclear, AI, or electrification without talking about the physical mineral that makes those systems possible.
That’s the big shift. Ten years ago, no one in North America was talking about phosphate supply chains in the same breath as data-center resilience or national security. Now it is being recognized by governments as part of the critical-mineral ecosystem that underpins both.
Canada already treats phosphate as critical, the EU also. The United States has now added phosphate to its own critical minerals list, explicitly tying it to things like energy storage, data centers, advanced manufacturing and defense.
In geopolitical terms, igneous phosphate is less like fertilizer rock and more like an artifact from an Indiana Jones movie; extremely rare, highly sought after, and usually found in places where the map gets a little sketchy.

There are only a handful of places on Earth where igneous phosphate shows up in meaningful volumes.
Most of the battery-relevant igneous feedstock sits either in politically complex jurisdictions or in regions where downstream value chains are already spoken for. China dominates the refining stage globally. Morocco dominates raw tonnage. Russia and South Africa sit under varying degrees of geopolitical risk.
If you are building an LFP supply chain for North American battery plants, nuclear-powered data centers, or grid-scale storage, none of those regions give you the combination you want: high purity, friendly jurisdiction, stable rule of law, and proximity to ports and industrial hubs.
Which is why Canada’s igneous systems have suddenly become strategic assets in their own right. They are not just mineral deposits, they are home-field advantage. High purity geology, stable rule of law, proximity to ports and existing heavy infrastructure and the ability to build an phosphate supply chain that stays inside North America from start to finish.
⚡ First Phosphate and the Fight for North America’s Home-Field Advantage
Once you realize how strategically rare igneous phosphate really is, the conversation stops being purely geological and becomes geopolitical. When only a tiny fraction of the world’s deposits can make battery- and tech-grade feedstock, the question becomes: who controls the few that matter?
And this is where First Phosphate (CSE: PHOS, OTCQX: FRSPF) enters the picture.
First Phosphate whole identity is built around a single idea: North America needs a secure, traceable, high-purity phosphate supply chain, and the only way to get it is by developing its own igneous deposits rather than relying on global competitors.
The company’s flagship Bégin-Lamarche property in Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, sits on one of the very few known igneous phosphate systems in the Western hemisphere. These are the kinds of deposits that can produce the ultra-clean phosphoric acid needed for grid-storage materials, advanced manufacturing inputs, and the energy-security infrastructure now showing up in policy documents.

Geology is the foundation, but the strategy goes well beyond the rock.
First Phosphate has spent the past two years building a genuine mine-to-market framework. The company has completed pilot production work, advanced resource definition, secured industrial land at Port Saguenay, and signed multiple offtake agreements with North American and European counterparties who need a stable, non-geopolitically-constrained phosphate source.
And importantly, it has already tested the chain it wants to build.
Over the past year, First Phosphate has taken rock from its Québec deposit, processed it into purified phosphoric acid, converted that into iron phosphate precursor, turned that into LFP cathode active material, and finally produced full LFP battery cells made entirely from North American critical minerals.
Very few early-stage mineral developers can say they have validated the entire downstream pathway of their product before commercial construction even begins. It is a signal that the company is not just exploring a deposit, it is architecting an entire supply chain around it.
Momentum on that front has now carried into its funding progress.
In November, First Phosphate closed not one but two oversubscribed private-placement rounds backed by strategic and follow-on investors. Across both tranches, the company raised $3.57 million, bringing its total capital raised since 2022 to approximately $43.6 million, all through management-led, non-brokered financings.
In a market where raising money has become materially harder, that level of consistent support matters. It suggests investors are not simply buying into a drill program, they are buying into a thesis: that North America will need a domestic source of high-purity igneous phosphate, and that Québec may be one of the few places on Earth where that story can actually be built.
⚛️ Wrapping Up
A few years ago, almost nobody in the nuclear, energy, or policy world was talking about phosphate, then LFP batteries went mainstream, AI began rewriting the map of electricity demand, and governments suddenly realized that not all phosphate is created equal.
Igneous phosphate, the rare, high-purity kind North America barely has, went from a geological curiosity to a strategic asset. The moment that happened, the question became simple: who can actually build a home-grown supply chain on top of it?
First Phosphate is attempting to answer that question in a way few early-stage developers do. It is not just drilling. It is not just modelling a resource. It is pressure-testing every link in the chain, from Québec rock to purified phosphoric acid, from precursor to cathode material, all the way to full LFP batteries made from North American inputs.
The world is shifting toward electrification, AI power demand, and secure clean-tech supply chains. Igneous phosphate may be a small mineral by volume, but it’s sitting in the middle of that shift.
And First Phosphate suddenly finds itself holding something that everyone else wants.
– Fredrik
For more information on First Phosphate’s work, visit their website https://firstphosphate.com/
Disclosure: This Deep Dive was created in collaboration with First Phosphate, which sponsored this post. All analysis and opinions are those of Nuclear Update.
What did you think of this week's email? |
DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. Nuclear Update is for informational and educational purposes only, it’s here to help you understand the world of uranium, energy, and the markets that orbit them, not to tell you what to buy or sell. Nothing in this article should be taken as a recommendation or solicitation to make any financial decision. Always do your own research, double-check sources, and talk to a licensed professional before making investments. Markets move fast, opinions change, and yes, sometimes even Fredrik gets things wrong.
Reply